The Free To Choose Medicine plan would empower patients, advised by their doctors, to make informed decisions about whether to use approved drugs or new drugs in late stage clinical testing.
It would save lives and end needless suffering by creating a Free To Choose Track around the FDA for patients and their doctors to access new drugs years before they complete FDA trials
“Madden’s market-based solution appeals to economists like me who are keenly aware of the critical importance of institutional design for a system to promote decentralized responses close to the local knowledge that is available to physicians and their patients, but not to the FDA. This book is fundamentally bipartisan and should be read in that spirit.”
Vernon L. Smith
Nobel Laureate in Economics
Adopting the Free to Choose Medicine plan would result in…
People are suffering and dying because they are denied timely access to new drugs stuck in the FDA new drug approval pipeline.
Lower health care costs, as new drugs come to market faster and at lower prices.
Healthier, longer, more productive lives for ourselves and our families.
The purpose of the drugs-to-patients system should be to deliver better drugs, sooner, at lower cost, not to chase after the impossible goal of zero risk.
The Free to Choose Medicine plan does not eliminate the role of the FDA in the drug approval process. A drug company can opt to remain within the current approval process for any of its drugs. FTCM sets up a competing system that would allow manufacturers to market new drugs after completion of the FDA’s Phase I testing and at least one round of Phase II testing, contingent upon certification of a FTCM Committee that the drug successfully completed that testing. The drug could then be made available to patients and, based on the real-world, observational data collected from patient usage, the company could seek Observational Approval from the FDA to market the drug to the general public. The FTCM system of patients use, usage monitoring and reporting and FDA observational approval, would bring drugs to market faster, at reduced prices and encourage expansion of companies seeking to develop, test and market new drugs.
The U.S. drugs-to-patients system fails to achieve its overall system goal of better drugs, sooner, at lower cost.
The key constraint that impedes achieving this goal is the FDA’s enormously expensive and time consuming clinical testing process.
Free To Choose Medicine would empower patients, advised by their doctors, to make informed decisions about whether to use approved drugs or new drugs in late stage clinical testing.
This third edition of Bartley J. Madden’s book Free To Choose Medicine describes how we can achieve a defining moment for America—a directional change from today’s trend of increasing litigation and regulation as well as a stake in the ground anchoring the undeniable truth that control of medical decisions belongs, first and foremost, with individual patients and doctors, not the government.